“NCMP Scheme’s Role in Ensuring Opposition in Parliament: Reflecting on Four Decades of Change “

HomeTechnology

“NCMP Scheme’s Role in Ensuring Opposition in Parliament: Reflecting on Four Decades of Change “

"How Singapore's Non-Constituency MP scheme has shaped political representation. "

my-portfolio

SINGAPORE: Introduced in 1984 by the People’s Action Party (PAP), the Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) scheme was intended to guarantee a

NTU Researchers Unlock New Insights into Quantum Properties of Topological Materials
“How Singapore’s Defence Achieves a Technological Advantage: The Unseen Elements at Play “
Survey Finds 2 in 3 Singaporeans Exposed to Harmful Online Content

SINGAPORE: Introduced in 1984 by the People’s Action Party (PAP), the Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) scheme was intended to guarantee a minimum opposition presence in Parliament. This historic change aimed to include opposition perspectives, enabling checks and balances even when the ruling party held the majority.

The NCMP scheme was introduced by then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew to provide both Parliament and citizens with experience of an opposition voice in the legislative process. Initially, it allowed for three opposition representatives, later increased to 12, with unrestricted voting rights. This was particularly impactful when, in the 1984 General Election, the ruling party saw its share drop below 70% of the popular vote for the first time.

Over time, NCMPs have voiced concerns, debated policies, and brought attention to public issues. Critics argue that the NCMP scheme, though a step towards political inclusivity, does not substitute for elected opposition MPs who hold direct mandates from their constituencies. Still, its influence is clear, with NCMPs participating in key debates and providing critical perspectives on policy matters.

The scheme has continued to evolve, adapting to Singapore’s shifting political landscape. Today, it remains a unique element of Singapore’s parliamentary system, continuing to contribute to a culture of inclusive debate and accountability in governance.

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 0
DISQUS: